63 People Will Appear In Courts Across QLD On 14 December

QLD Courts Data

Queensland's magistrates courts are set to handle over 60 cases today on September 4, with people from different walks of life appearing in courtrooms across the state.

Cases subject to suppression or non-publication orders are not included in the figures. Suppression orders prevent the disclosure of information that would typically be accessible during an open court proceeding.

Today's court appearances are broken down by local magistrates courts as follows:

CourtAppearances
Brisbane (Roma Street)19
Ipswich11
Maroochydore7
Townsville7
Southport5
Mackay4
Mount Isa3
Cairns2
Doomadgee 2
Beenleigh1
Bundaberg1
Rockhampton1

Daily court listings are published every day as part of our ongoing commitment to public interest journalism, compiled from publicly available court information across Australia to ensure transparency and keep the public informed.

These court listings are based on public records, with no suggestion whatsoever of any wrongdoing by anyone named in them. People may be appearing in court for various reasons, including procedural or routine matters.

Beenleigh

MatterCourt NumberTime
Penese, Xzyries Rockeylane19:00AM

Brisbane (Roma Street)

MatterCourt NumberTime
Blair, Audrey Silvia, Miss18:30AM
Brown, Leonard Kylue Orlando, Mr18:30AM
Cliff, Daniel James, Mr18:30AM
Condon, Michael David18:30AM
Copas, Noel James, Mr19:00AM
Copas, Noel James, Mr18:30AM
Dalgleish, Schaunnette, Miss18:30AM
Dalgleish, Schaunnette, Miss19:00AM
Hughes, Mark Dale18:30AM
Kapernick, Kerry Robert, Mr18:30AM
Logan, Kyisha Maisie Rose18:30AM
Maher, Daniel Benjamen18:30AM
Michael, Quinta Simone, Miss39:00AM
Penese, Xzyries Rockeylane19:00AM
Redpath, David -18:30AM
Redpath, David -29:00AM
Rogers, Kini Kalulu Katie18:30AM
Rogers, Kini Kalulu Katie19:00AM
Seaton, Shane Michael19:00AM

Bundaberg

MatterCourt NumberTime
Maloney, Quade Dylan19:00AM

Cairns

MatterCourt NumberTime
Ibrahim, Islewyn19:00AM
Lop, Vincent19:00AM

Doomadgee

MatterCourt NumberTime
George, Teonie Maragipsy18:30AM
O'Keefe, Patrick19:00AM

Ipswich

MatterCourt NumberTime
Allen, Mark Anthony, Mr18:30AM
Collingwood, Samuel Lloyd Alexander, Mr18:30AM
Gibbs, Lisa Mary, Ms19:00AM
Hooper, Allan Gordon, Mr19:00AM
Jongkuch, Kur Jongkuch18:30AM
Lake, Byron Lewis19:00AM
Majok, Elijah Atem18:30AM
Oram, Hal Thomas19:00AM
Rathborne, Kobi Anthony19:00AM
Simpson, Alexander Albert19:00AM
Skates, Jordan19:00AM

Mackay

MatterCourt NumberTime
Bazzocco, Mackenzie29:00AM
Bazzocco, Mackenzie19:00AM
Daniel, Milton Colin James19:00AM
Morgan, Drew Liam19:00AM

Maroochydore

MatterCourt NumberTime
Chapman, Trevor Barron Laukai18:30AM
Crummy, Robert James19:00AM
Johnson, Darren William, Mr19:00AM
Mcgrath, Kaleb Seth18:30AM
Murray, Richard Vincent19:00AM
Tulk, John Edward18:30AM
Voysey, Jodie Ann19:00AM

Mount Isa

MatterCourt NumberTime
Riley, Anthony Russell, Mr18:30AM
Smith, Jarrod Oliver18:30AM
Spain, Jamon Lance Edward18:30AM

Rockhampton

MatterCourt NumberTime
Stafford, Brett Anthony, Mr19:00AM

Southport

MatterCourt NumberTime
Bell, Renee Joyanne18:30AM
Mudge, Hayley, Miss18:30AM
O'Connor, Jacob Anthony18:30AM
Smith, Dorion18:30AM
Stevens, Jake Paul18:30AM

Townsville

MatterCourt NumberTime
Brady, Robert Glenn19:00AM
Cundy, Scott Douglas19:00AM
Lyons, Jaycie Maree19:00AM
Smedley, Brendan Garry, Mr19:30AM
Snyder, Stewart Elliott, Mr19:00AM
Watson, Morris Anthony19:00AM
Yasserie, David Lenin Tyrone19:00AM

Open justice is a cornerstone of the Australian legal system, ensuring that court proceedings are transparent and accessible to the public. This principle is fundamental to maintaining public confidence in the fairness, integrity, and efficiency of the judiciary. By allowing the public to scrutinize court processes, open justice acts as a safeguard against abuses of power, ensuring that justice is not only done but seen to be done. It helps foster accountability within the judicial system, reinforcing the idea that everyone is treated equally before the law.

However, there are exceptions to the principle of open justice when transparency could interfere with the proper administration of justice. In such cases, courts may issue suppression or non-publication orders to protect sensitive information. These orders are made in circumstances where openness could cause harm, such as endangering national security, compromising justice, or causing undue distress to individuals involved. The balance between transparency and protecting sensitive details ensures that justice is both effective and fair while safeguarding individuals' rights and public interests.

Every effort has been made to comply with non-publication (suppression) orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this information.

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.