70 Appearances In QLD Magistrates Courts 8 February

QLD Courts Data

On September 4, Queensland's magistrates courts will see 70 appearances across the state, with a busy day in the legal system.

Cases subject to suppression or non-publication orders are excluded from this figure. Courts take great care to comply with these legal restrictions, ensuring that sensitive information and protected individuals are not made public.

Today's court appearances, listed by magistrates court from the highest to lowest number of cases, are as follows:

CourtAppearances
Brisbane (Roma Street)17
Southport12
Cairns11
Gympie 8
Townsville8
Warwick6
Mackay4
Rockhampton2
Gladstone1
Normanton1

These daily court listings reflect our commitment to transparency and public interest journalism, relying on publicly available information shared by courts in all Australian states and territories.

These court listings are based on public records, with no suggestion whatsoever of any wrongdoing by anyone named in them. People may be appearing in court for various reasons, including procedural or routine matters.

Brisbane (Roma Street)

MatterCourt NumberTime
Appleton, John James18:30AM
Beezley, Tyrone Nicholas19:00AM
Bennett, Reece19:00AM
Browning, Nathan18:30AM
Cha, Wan Sook19:00AM
Dabner, Zackariah Leslie Gordon18:30AM
Dawson, Jodi Maree, Ms18:30AM
Fletcher, Malcolm, Mr19:00AM
Fletcher, Malcolm, Mr18:30AM
Idris, Abdalaziz Ismail19:00AM
Jones, Brendan18:30AM
Jordan, Bradley Kenneth, Mr18:30AM
Kirk, Matthew John, Mr18:30AM
Kulics, Nicole Marie18:30AM
Kulics, Nicole Marie19:00AM
Pilton, Osiah18:30AM
Rikihana, Parewhero, Mr18:30AM

Cairns

MatterCourt NumberTime
Ambrym, Dharion18:30AM
Baker, David Willie18:30AM
Baker, David Willie19:00AM
Buckley, Luke David18:30AM
Free, Aaron Edward110:48AM
Free, Aaron Edward19:00AM
Gilbert, Silverstein Matthew18:30AM
Kemp, Tajana Rayshell Kelly-M19:00AM
Leeson, Aaron Francis19:00AM
Sykes, Nathan James19:00AM
Uprichard, Ronald19:00AM

Gladstone

MatterCourt NumberTime
Barnes, Jayden, Mr18:30AM

Gympie

MatterCourt NumberTime
Burnett, Kai Jackson, Mr18:30AM
Cassidy, Joshua Francis18:30AM
Cornwell, Jodie Leanne18:30AM
Druery, Jaxon Neville18:30AM
Farrell, Bianca Rose, Miss18:30AM
Haase, Steven Kent18:30AM
Monks, Joshua18:30AM
Taylor, Nicholas Geoffrey, Mr18:30AM

Mackay

MatterCourt NumberTime
Armstrong, Ian Duane18:30AM
Boland, Simeon Nicholas19:00AM
Santo, Tyrone Joel18:30AM
Winner, Krista Rose19:00AM

Normanton

MatterCourt NumberTime
Casey, Dexter Robert Paul19:00AM

Rockhampton

MatterCourt NumberTime
Desatge, Billy Joe Steven18:30AM
Graham, Jason Neil18:30AM

Southport

MatterCourt NumberTime
Annand, Samantha29:00AM
Coulthard, Lucas John18:30AM
Coulthard, Lucas John29:00AM
Gibson, Natasha29:00AM
Hunt, Sarah Naomi18:30AM
Jack, Jarrod Marlin18:30AM
Kelly, Latoya, Miss29:00AM
Pendrick, Adam James18:30AM
Pinkerton, Jade Sonia29:00AM
Pinkerton, Jade Sonia19:00AM
Thompson-Cooper, Summer Louise18:30AM
Tweedie, Natasha29:00AM

Townsville

MatterCourt NumberTime
Bradford, Jason John James19:00AM
Campbell-O'Rourke, Wesley Jack19:00AM
Clifford, Jozef William19:00AM
Delaney, Kerryd John19:00AM
Nathan, Dale Ian19:00AM
Rewha, Diana Kitty Beverly, Miss19:00AM
Rimmington, Benjamin Robert, Mr19:00AM
Wyles, Wilfred Patrick19:00AM

Warwick

MatterCourt NumberTime
Etchell, Thomas Leslie19:00AM
Hooper, Gavin Carl, Mr18:30AM
Nowlan, Trevor Daniel John19:00AM
Nunn, Anthony Patrick19:00AM
Swan, Ryan Nathan, Mr19:00AM
Willett, Phillip John, Mr18:30AM

Open justice is a cornerstone of the Australian legal system, ensuring that court proceedings are transparent and accessible to the public. This principle is fundamental to maintaining public confidence in the fairness, integrity, and efficiency of the judiciary. By allowing the public to scrutinize court processes, open justice acts as a safeguard against abuses of power, ensuring that justice is not only done but seen to be done. It helps foster accountability within the judicial system, reinforcing the idea that everyone is treated equally before the law.

However, there are exceptions to the principle of open justice when transparency could interfere with the proper administration of justice. In such cases, courts may issue suppression or non-publication orders to protect sensitive information. These orders are made in circumstances where openness could cause harm, such as endangering national security, compromising justice, or causing undue distress to individuals involved. The balance between transparency and protecting sensitive details ensures that justice is both effective and fair while safeguarding individuals' rights and public interests.

Every effort has been made to comply with non-publication (suppression) orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this information.

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.