Are Sweden's climate goals in line with Paris Agreement?

Chalmers University of Technology

​This is an issue that has been debated lately in Sweden. Three researchers from Chalmers - Johannes Morfeldt, Christian Azar and Daniel Johansson - have in a new report come to the following conclusions:

  • Johannes Morfeldt​​Sweden's (territorial) emission target is compatible with the 1.5 degree target given that the global carbon dioxide emission space is distributed evenly per person and year.
  • Sweden's (territorial) emissions target is compatible with the 1.5-degree target, even if we also take historical responsibility for our carbon dioxide emissions from sometime in the 1990s.
  • If Sweden takes responsibility for emissions further back in time, we would need more ambitious goals (than the current ones).
Christian AzarIPCC has estimated the amount of carbon the world can emit in order to meet the 1,5 degree target (a carbon budget). In order to determine how much each country can emit within this global budget, i.e., to scale down the emission budget to a national level, various principles of justice may be applied. The choice of principle may have a significant impact on the results.
Finally, the researchers address the role of science in this debate. Science is central to calculating what global emission space is left to reach a certain temperature target. But science cannot determine which distribution principle is right. How the remaining emission space is to be distributed between countries is basically an ethical and political issue and not an issue that science can decide.
Christian Azar, Professor of Energy and environment, Department of Space, Earth and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology.

Daniel Johansson​, Associate Professor, Department of Space, Earth and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology.

/University Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.