Cloud "engineering" could be more effective for climate cooling than previously thought - because of the increased cloud cover produced, new research shows.
In a study published in Nature Geoscience, a research team led by the University of Birmingham found that marine cloud brightening (MCB), also known as marine cloud engineering, works primarily by increasing the amount of cloud cover, accounting for 60-90% of the cooling effect.
Previous models used to estimate the cooling effects of MCB have focused on the ability of aerosol injection to produce a brightening effect on the cloud, which in turn increases the amount of sunlight reflected back into space.
The practice of MCB has attracted much attention in recent years as a way of offsetting the global warming effects caused by humans and buying some time while the global economy decarbonises.
It works by spraying tiny particles, or aerosols, into the atmosphere where they mix with clouds and with the primary aim of increasing the amount of sunlight that clouds can reflect.
Experiments with the technique are already being used in Australia in an attempt to reduce bleaching on the Great Barrier Reef.
However, the ways in which MCB creates a cooling effect, and the ways in which clouds will respond to aerosols, are still poorly understood.
To investigate the phenomenon, the researchers created a "natural experiment", using aerosol injection from the effusive eruption of Kilauea volcano in Hawaii to study the interactions between these natural aerosols, clouds and climate.
Using machine learning and historic satellite and meteorological data, the team created a predictor to show that how the cloud would behave during periods when the volcano was inactive.
This predictor enabled them to identify clearly the impacts on the clouds that had been directly caused by the volcanic aerosols.
They were able to show that the cloud cover relatively increased by up to 50% during the periods of volcanic activity, producing a cooling effect of up to -10 W m-2 regionally.
Global heating and cooling is measured in watts per square metre, with a negative figure indicating cooling. Note that doubling CO2 would lead to a warming effect of +3.7 W m-2 approximately on a global average.
The research was carried out in collaboration with the Met Office, the universities of Exeter, Edinburgh, Reading and Leeds, ETH Zurich in Switzerland, and the University of Maryland and NASA in USA.
Lead author, Dr Ying Chen, of the University of Birmingham, said: "Our findings show that marine cloud brightening could be more effective as a climate intervention than climate models have suggested previously.
"Of course, while it could be useful, MCB does not address the underlying causes of global warming from greenhouse gases produced by human activity.
"It should therefore be regarded as a 'painkiller', rather than a solution, and we must continue to improve fundamental understanding of aerosol's impacts on clouds, further research on global impacts and risks of MCB, and search for ways to decarbonise human activities."
Professor Jim Haywood, from the University of Exeter and the Met Office Hadley Centre, said: "This work adds to the growing evidence that current climate models may underestimate the impact of aerosols on clouds as they don't seem to have a strong enough response. More aerosols seem to result in a larger cloud fraction, which cools the climate more than the models predict. Hence, marine cloud brightening could be more effective than previously thought. However, there is still so much that we don't understand about aerosol-cloud interactions meaning that further investigations are imperative."
The research comes alongside increased interest in cloud engineering around the globe.
UK Research and Innovation has recently launched a £10.5m research programme looking at informing policymakers on solar radiation management approaches, including MCB, while the Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA), is focused on researching technologies for climate and weather management.
