Fed Unveils Scenarios for Annual Stress Test

Federal Reserve

The Federal Reserve Board on Wednesday released the hypothetical scenarios for its annual stress test, which helps ensure that large banks can lend to households and businesses even in a severe recession. Additionally, the Board released two hypothetical elements designed to probe different risks through its "exploratory analysis" of the banking system. The exploratory analysis will not affect bank capital requirements.

The Board's annual stress test evaluates the resilience of large banks by estimating losses, net revenue, and capital levels-which provide a cushion against losses-under hypothetical recession scenarios that extend two years into the future. This year, 22 banks will be tested against a severe global recession with heightened stress in both commercial and residential real estate markets, as well as in corporate debt markets. The scenarios are not forecasts and should not be interpreted as predictions of future economic conditions.

In the 2025 stress test scenario, the U.S. unemployment rate rises nearly 5.9 percentage points, to a peak of 10 percent. The unemployment rate increase is accompanied by severe market volatility, a widening of corporate bond spreads, and a collapse in asset prices, including about a 33 percent decline in house prices and a 30 percent decline in commercial real estate prices.

Large banks with substantial trading or custodial operations are also required to incorporate a counterparty default scenario component to estimate potential losses from the unexpected default of the firm's largest counterparty amid an acute market shock. In addition, banks with large trading operations will be tested against a global market shock component that primarily stresses their trading and related positions.

The table below shows the components of the annual stress test that apply to each bank, based on data as of the third quarter of 2024.

This year's exploratory analysis includes two separate hypothetical elements that will assess the resilience of the banking system to a wider range of risks. One of the hypothetical elements examines how banks would react to credit and liquidity shocks in the non-bank financial institution sector during a severe global recession.

The second element of the exploratory analysis includes a market shock that will be applied only to the largest and most complex banks. This shock hypothesizes the failure of five large hedge funds with reduced global economic activity and higher inflation.

The exploratory analysis is distinct from the stress test and will explore additional hypothetical risks to the broader banking system, rather than focusing on firm-specific results. The Board will publish aggregate results for the exploratory analysis alongside the annual stress test results in June 2025.

As the Board previously announced, it plans to take steps soon to reduce the volatility of stress test results and begin to improve model transparency in the 2025 stress test. Additionally, it intends to begin the public comment process on its comprehensive changes to the stress test this year.

Bank1 Subject to global market shockSubject to counterparty default
American Express Company
Bank of America CorporationXX
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation X
Barclays US LLCXX
BMO Financial Corp.
Capital One Financial Corporation
The Charles Schwab Corporation
Citigroup Inc.XX
DB USA CorporationXX
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.XX
JPMorgan Chase & Co.XX
M&T Bank Corporation2
Morgan StanleyXX
Northern Trust Corporation
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
RBC US Group Holdings LLC2
State Street Corporation X
TD Group US Holdings LLC
Truist Financial Corporation
UBS Americas Holding LLC
U.S. Bancorp
Wells Fargo & CompanyXX

1. The information listed in this table is based on third quarter 2024 data. Return to text

2. M&T Bank Corporation and RBC US Group Holdings LLC elected to opt into the 2025 stress test. Return to text

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.