Lifecycle Approach to Carbon-Neutral Construction

PlanRadar

Carbon-neutral construction aims to reduce the environmental impact of the construction industry by addressing carbon emissions and resource efficiency throughout a building's lifecycle. This comprehensive approach, known as the lifecycle approach, considers every phase of a building's existence—from design and construction to operation and demolition.

Research from the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) shows that the construction industry is responsible for 38% of all energy-related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions annually, equivalent to around 14 gigatons. However, less than 1% of building projects currently calculate and report their full carbon footprint.

Lifecycle Assessment (LCA) is a crucial tool in achieving carbon neutrality in construction. It evaluates a building's environmental impact from raw material extraction to demolition, measuring resource use, energy consumption, and emissions at each stage. This data informs sustainable decision-making, enabling construction projects to significantly reduce their carbon footprint and move towards true carbon neutrality.

The key phases of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) typically include:

  • Goal and scope definition

  • Inventory analysis

  • Impact assessment

  • Interpretation (analysing the results of the inventory analysis and impact assessment)

  • Improvement analysis

Leon Ward, Regional Lead for Australia + New Zealand at PlanRadar, comments, "By focusing on the entire lifespan, construction projects can implement strategies to minimise environmental impact, such as selecting low-carbon materials, employing energy-efficient systems, enhancing operational practices, and planning for deconstruction and material reuse."

Key benefits of incorporating LCA into construction projects

Research from McKinsey & Company indicates that decarbonising the built environment can create $800 billion to $1.9 trillion in new green value across multiple industry sectors. In construction projects, using LCA is vital to reach environmental sustainability goals, reduce environmental impact, and create a more resilient, resource-efficient built environment. Incorporating Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) into construction projects offers numerous benefits:

  • Informed decision-making

  • Identification of "hotspots" or areas of significant environmental impact

  • Optimisation of resource use

  • Improved sustainability performance

  • Compliance with regulations and environmental certification standards such as LEED, NABERS, Green Star or BREEAM

  • Enhanced stakeholder engagement

Challenges and opportunities in building lifecycle management

Implementing the lifecycle approach to carbon-neutral construction can present a number of potential challenges, such as the complexity of assessing environmental impacts throughout a building's lifespan and the resistance to change within the industry. This process requires extensive data collection, analysis, and coordination among multiple parties, which can be resource-intensive and time-consuming. However, opportunities for innovation exist through leveraging technologies like Building Information Modeling (BIM), data analytics, and digital twin simulations to streamline assessments and optimise performance. Additionally, smart building technologies, IoT sensors, automation, and circular economy principles can enhance energy efficiency and promote resource reuse and recycling, reducing waste and carbon emissions in construction.

Throughout the span of a building's lifecycle, from design to construction to end of life, there are a number of ways to consider reducing environmental impact for long-term sustainability measures.

1. Design phase: Minimising environmental impact

To achieve carbon neutrality during the design phase of construction projects, key strategies can include incorporating passive design principles to maximise natural light, ventilation, and thermal comfort, reducing reliance on artificial systems. Buildings should be designed with optimal orientation and shading for energy efficiency and minimal solar heat gain. Utilising biophilic design can enhance occupant well-being. Prioritising low-carbon materials, such as recycled or locally sourced options, helps minimise embodied carbon emissions. Considering the life cycle impacts of materials, and selecting those with high thermal performance and durability, also reduces energy consumption and the need for frequent replacements.

2. Construction phase: Implementing sustainable practices

Integrating sustainable practices throughout the construction phase is also crucial for minimising environmental impact. Key considerations include adopting prefabrication and modular construction techniques to reduce waste and streamline processes, and implementing lean construction principles to optimise resource use and improve efficiency. Utilising Building Information Modeling (BIM) and digital technologies enhances project planning and minimises errors. Energy-efficient building systems, such as advanced HVAC and lighting, along with renewable energy sources like solar panels, help reduce energy consumption and costs. Additionally, construction waste management plans that promote recycling and the use of reclaimed materials are essential for minimising waste and environmental impact.

3. Operation and maintenance phase: Optimising building performance

During the operation and maintenance phase of a building's lifecycle, optimising performance is essential. Implementing energy management systems to monitor and optimise energy use can identify savings opportunities. Energy conservation measures like occupancy sensors, programmable thermostats, and efficient lighting reduce waste and operational costs. Proactive maintenance plans ensure the functionality of building systems, with regular inspections and servicing to prevent downtime and costly repairs. Facility management teams can also explore opportunities for demand response, load shedding, and peak shaving to reduce energy demand during periods of high usage or peak pricing, maximising cost savings and grid reliability.

4. End-of-life phase: Planning for demolition and deconstruction

In the end-of-life phase of a building's lifecycle, careful planning for demolition and deconstruction is also key. Building management and demolition teams should focus on developing a demolition plan that focuses on waste reduction, material recovery, and environmental protection, while considering site conditions, regulations, and community impacts. Assess and remediate hazardous materials like asbestos and lead-based paint to ensure safety. Establish waste management protocols to maximise recycling and minimise landfill waste. Prioritise salvaging and reusing materials, using deconstruction techniques to preserve valuable components and reduce waste. Explore alternative methods like mechanical dismantling and adaptive reuse to enhance material recovery, reduce environmental impact, and promote resource conservation.

Embracing sustainability: Key takeaways and the importance of lifecycle thinking

The carbon-neutral construction approach is essential for reducing buildings' environmental impact throughout their lifecycle, from design to demolition. By addressing every phase, construction projects can cut carbon emissions, optimise resource use, and enhance sustainability, leading to long-term cost savings and resilience. Utilising lifecycle assessment, selecting low-carbon materials, employing energy-efficient systems, and planning for material reuse are vital steps for achieving carbon neutrality and creating a sustainable future.

Leon Ward adds, "By investing in research, sharing best practices, and backing initiatives that support sustainability, we can speed up the shift towards carbon-neutral construction and create a built environment that meets the needs of current and future generations."

Key Facts:

  • The construction industry accounts for 38% of all energy-related greenhouse gas emissions annually, equivalent to around 14 gigatons, according to WBCSD research.

  • Despite this, less than 1% of building projects currently calculate and report their full carbon footprint.

  • McKinsey & Company research suggests that decarbonising the built environment can create $800 billion to $1.9 trillion in new green value across multiple industries.

  • Lifecycle Assessment (LCA) evaluates a building's environmental impact by considering every phase of a building's existence, from design and construction to operation and demolition, aiding sustainable decision-making.

  • Leon Ward of PlanRadar highlights the importance of focusing on a building's entire lifespan to minimise environmental impact through strategies like selecting low-carbon materials and enhancing operational practices.

About us:

PlanRadar is an award-winning, digital SaaS platform for documentation, communication and reporting in construction, facility management and real estate projects. The platform operates across the globe, currently in over 75 markets. PlanRadar streamlines daily processes and communication in an easy-to-use digital platform which connects all project stakeholders and provides real-time access to valuable project data. PlanRadar enables customers to work more efficiently, enhance quality and achieve full project transparency. The platform adds value to every person involved in a building's lifecycle, from contractors and engineers to property managers and owners, with flexible capabilities for all company sizes and processes. Today, over 150,000 professionals are using PlanRadar to track, connect and solve issues on and off-site. PlanRadar is currently available in more than 25 languages, and can be used across all iOS, Windows and Android devices. Headquartered in Vienna, Austria, PlanRadar has 16 offices across the globe.

Visit our website at www.planradar.com

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).