National Redress Scheme Report Released

Parliament of Australia

The Joint Standing Committee on the Implementation of the National Redress Scheme has today tabled its report, following its inquiry into the operation of the National Redress Scheme. The report "Redress: Journey to Justice" was agreed to by all committee members.

Committee Chair, Senator Catryna Bilyk, said, 'we acknowledge what the Scheme has achieved for many survivors, as well as the hard work and effort that goes into administering the Scheme. However, the Committee's unanimous findings have highlighted barriers to accessing the Scheme, which need to be addressed to ensure no further harm is done to survivors of institutional child sexual abuse'.

The Deputy Chair, Senator Dean Smith, said 'we thank the many members of the public who bravely shared their experiences with the Committee. You have been heard and the report's recommendations reflect your vital insights.'

The report makes 29 recommendations, which focus on the accessibility, performance and effectiveness of the Scheme. This includes whether the Scheme is meeting the needs of victims and survivors who are seeking redress, whether those needs will be met before the Scheme is due to cease in 2028, and whether the Scheme fairly and accurately assesses the needs of each survivor seeking redress.

The Committee has also recommended improving the accessibility of quality legal advice, and support services, for survivors of institutional child sexual abuse seeking redress.

The Committee urges all named institutions and governments to work together to continue National Redress Scheme reform.

The Committee sincerely appreciates the contributions made by survivors to the inquiry.

The full report of the inquiry can be found on the Committee's inquiry webpage.

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).