OPAN Alarmed by Insufficient Aged Care Funds in Budget

Older Persons Advocacy Network (OPAN)

The Older Persons Advocacy Network (OPAN) has expressed concern that the Federal Budget lacks adequate funding for the aged care sector.

OPAN CEO Craig Gear OAM acknowledged the $291 million in this Budget to continue to deliver on the recommendations from the Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety, but reiterated that older people continue to wait too long for Home Care Packages.

"Unsurprisingly, this Budget had a strong focus on easing the cost of living pressures facing Australian families in the lead-up to a Federal election," Mr Gear said.

"Our aged care sector is facing many challenges right now, including significant workforce shortages and a growing number of older people waiting for support.

"OPAN would have liked to see increased access to hardship provisions for older people who have limited financial means, to make sure they don't slip below the poverty line.

"Further, we continue to see an increase in people waiting for Home Care Packages, and that hasn't been addressed in this Budget. We are increasingly concerned that this figure will continue to grow."

Mr Gear was pleased to see $47 million over four years for First Nations organisations to deliver culturally appropriate care.

"We know that First Nations communities are particularly vulnerable, so we are glad to see tailored support for their aged care assessments – but this could have been taken further," Mr Gear said.

"We are also glad to see the new Aged Care Act is still scheduled to commence on 1 July 2025. We strongly encourage the Government to stick to this timeline.

"OPAN will continue to engage with the Federal Government on the implementation of this Budget to ensure the rights of older people are front and center."

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).