Over 50 People Appearing At Courts In Queensland Today

QLD Courts Data

Queensland's magistrates courts are set to handle over 50 cases today on September 4, with people from different walks of life appearing in courtrooms across the state.

Cases subject to suppression or non-publication orders are excluded from this figure. Courts take great care to comply with these legal restrictions, ensuring that sensitive information and protected individuals are not made public.

Today's court appearances, listed by magistrates court from the highest to lowest number of cases, are as follows:

CourtAppearances
Hervey Bay12
Brisbane (Roma Street)10
Cairns10
Mackay4
Mount Isa4
Bundaberg3
Southport3
Townsville3
Gladstone2
Rockhampton2
Mornington Island1
Pine Rivers1

In line with our commitment to transparency and public interest journalism, we publish daily court listings based on publicly accessible data provided by courts across Australia's states and territories.

The listings and details below are drawn from public records of individuals scheduled to appear in court, with no suggestion whatsoever of any wrongdoing by anyone named in these lists. It is crucial to note that individuals may appear in court for various reasons, including procedural matters.

Brisbane (Roma Street)

MatterCourt NumberTime
Allen, Thomas Maximilian, Mr18:30AM
Blyth, Caitlin-Jade19:00AM
Blyth, Caitlin-Jade18:30AM
Eldridge, Jesse Douglas19:00AM
Fitzgerald, Corey William18:30AM
Gooley, Dustin Micheal, Mr18:30AM
Hall, Shanon John George18:30AM
Isbister, Stephen Michael, Mr19:00AM
Mackenzie, Llewin William18:30AM
Tiyce, Dylan Patrick19:00AM

Bundaberg

MatterCourt NumberTime
Cleland, Dylan Angus18:30AM
Kurtzer, David William, Mr18:30AM
Wilkie, Amy Beverley, Miss19:00AM

Cairns

MatterCourt NumberTime
Billy, Michael Gavin, Mr19:00AM
Boseun, Timothy Rupert18:30AM
Bounghi, Needom Timothy, Mr19:00AM
Conrad, Wesley George, Mr19:00AM
Curtis, Mark William18:30AM
Ericson, Niklas, Mr19:00AM
Lee, James David, Mr19:00AM
Mercer, James Stafford, Mr19:00AM
Rowbotham, Alexander, Mr19:00AM
Williams, Justin Lee, Mr19:00AM

Gladstone

MatterCourt NumberTime
Delta, Laine Jane18:30AM
Delta, Michael Bernard Luke18:30AM

Hervey Bay

MatterCourt NumberTime
Abdy, Kade Devon18:30AM
Bridges, Mathew Phillip18:30AM
Brown, Philip James, Mr18:30AM
Murray, Sonny James, Mr19:00AM
Payton, Robbie Ronald18:30AM
Pedersen, Anthony John19:00AM
Perrett, Harley James18:30AM
Platts, Paula Nicole19:00AM
Platts, Paula Nicole18:30AM
Quaite, James William, Mr18:30AM
Reynolds, Jack Dylan18:30AM
Riley, Dylan John19:00AM

Mackay

MatterCourt NumberTime
Beddow, John Graham19:00AM
Koppensteiner, Beau Luke, Mr19:00AM
Mcgrath-Christensen, Aidan Chad19:00AM
Stumer, David Robert29:00AM

Mornington Island

MatterCourt NumberTime
Goongarra, Kristine Alison19:00AM

Mount Isa

MatterCourt NumberTime
Bowman, Rodney Paul, Mr18:30AM
Mirrlees, Scott Walker18:30AM
Poppell, Trent Robert E. Lee, Mr18:30AM
Rowland, Barbara Anne, Ms18:30AM

Pine Rivers

MatterCourt NumberTime
Watkins-Casey, Nathan, Mr18:30AM

Rockhampton

MatterCourt NumberTime
Burnett, Shannan Grant19:00AM
Row Row, William Lawrence, Mr19:00AM

Southport

MatterCourt NumberTime
Felsman, Loch18:30AM
Percy, Jeramiah Grant Sharmba18:30AM
Tupou, Henry Wilson19:00AM

Townsville

MatterCourt NumberTime
Barney, Russel Nathaniel19:00AM
Goudie, Kylie Anne19:00AM
Pearce, Lachlan19:00AM

Open justice is a cornerstone of the Australian legal system, ensuring that court proceedings are transparent and accessible to the public. This principle is fundamental to maintaining public confidence in the fairness, integrity, and efficiency of the judiciary. By allowing the public to scrutinize court processes, open justice acts as a safeguard against abuses of power, ensuring that justice is not only done but seen to be done. It helps foster accountability within the judicial system, reinforcing the idea that everyone is treated equally before the law.

However, there are exceptions to the principle of open justice when transparency could interfere with the proper administration of justice. In such cases, courts may issue suppression or non-publication orders to protect sensitive information. These orders are made in circumstances where openness could cause harm, such as endangering national security, compromising justice, or causing undue distress to individuals involved. The balance between transparency and protecting sensitive details ensures that justice is both effective and fair while safeguarding individuals' rights and public interests.

Every effort has been made to comply with non-publication (suppression) orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this information.

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.