Pacific Plea: Albanese, Dutton Urged to Act

Australia Institute

The letter - published in Australian newspapers today - points out the hypocrisy of successive Australian leaders, who have made promises about climate action to the faces of Pacific leaders but do the opposite when they return to Australia.

The letter points out some stark facts about how Australia is a terrible neighbour to its Pacific family.

Key points of the open letter:

  • Australia's fossil fuel project approvals undermine the survival and security of Pacific Island communities.
  • In September, Australia approved three coal mines which will create 1.4 billion tonnes of emissions, equivalent to the combined emissions from 12 Pacific Island nations for over 250 years.
  • In December, Australia refused to reconsider three more coal mines, paving the way for their approval, which could add a further 850 million tonnes of emissions.
  • Australia's actions do not match its commitments to its Pacific neighbours and are contrary to its support as signatory to various Pacific Island Forum Leaders' communiques.

"Pacific Island nations are already feeling the impact of climate change, with rising sea levels threatening their very existence," said Leanne Minshull, Strategic Director at The Australia Institute.

"Intense cyclones, king tides and droughts are putting their coast lines, food chains and water supplies in danger.

"Prime Minister Albanese constantly refers to our 'Pacific family', travelling the Pacific and ensuring leaders he's committed to climate change action.

"Then he returns home and leads a government that continues to approve some of the most destructive fossil fuel projects on earth."

"The most effective climate action a major fossil fuel exporter like Australia can take is to stop approving new gas or coal mines. Until that happens, all other climate action is like trying to patch up a pool while filling it with water."

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.