Parliament Urged to Act on Veteran Health and Wellbeing

Parliament must come together and work constructively to better the health and wellbeing of Australia's current and ex-serving ADF members and work towards stopping veteran deaths by suicides, says Consumers Health Forum of Australia CEO Dr Elizabeth Deveny.

Dr Deveny's comments come after the Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide handed its final report to the Governor-General yesterday.

"The last three years of the Royal Commission has shown us that the systems designed to support veterans and their families need real, fast and meaningful reform.

"We have all been touched by the lived-experience testimony of veterans and their families which exposed how the lack of support has had serious negative impacts on people's mental health and wellbeing and for many led to a death by suicide," said Dr Deveny.

The Royal Commission has made several health and wellbeing recommendations in its final report, including a recommendation to expand and strengthen healthcare services to veterans.

"CHF strongly supports the strengthening of healthcare services to veterans. Importantly this recommendation calls to provide support to primary healthcare providers working with veterans. It also calls for greater support to let veterans know what services are available. It's a pretty simple proposition that in order for someone to use a service, they need to know of its existence, we are supportive of any measures which help promote relevant services to the veterans' community. If implemented correctly, these measures will create better health equity for our veterans and could also be looked at as a future healthcare model to benefit civilian health service delivery," said Dr Deveny.

Dr Deveny said that when Government agencies start creating more wide-ranging healthcare services for the veteran community, they must co-design any new service or program, to ensure that the needs of veterans and their families are met.

"It has been really pleasing to see the need for co-design across the Royal Commission's recommendations. We know that when the people who use the service have a say and can influence its design and function, it often results in better take up of these services when implemented," said Dr Deveny.

The Final Report also recommends that health practitioners who work with veterans are supported, through education modules to build and improve their military cultural competency.

In recognition of the critical role Defence families play, the Final Report has recommended that the communication, services and support families receive is improved.

"We heard during the Royal Commission just how important families are in supporting current and ex-serving ADF members. When we are sick or recovering from an injury, we all know how important family love and support is in our recovery. CHF is pleased to see family members, who often take on caring roles, recognised in the Final Report," said Dr Deveny.

CHF also supports recommendations to strengthen the Department of Veterans' Affairs performance targets for claims processing timeframes which would see at least 80% of claims being determined within 90 days by 1 July 2028. Having compensation claims managed in a respectful, timely and trauma-informed way will go a great way in helping veterans access the health and wellbeing services they need, while reducing their fear and anxiety about their claims, which the Royal Commission demonstrated could be a contributing factor of veteran deaths by suicide.

"The Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide has shown all Australians where the current system is letting our veterans and their families down. It also showed us what needs to be done to prevent veteran deaths by suicide. No longer can any politician or government say they didn't know. I strongly encourage the parliament to work collectively in the best interests of current and ex-serving members of the ADF and accept the Commission's Final Report recommendations," said Dr Deveny.

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.