Australia's nuclear regulator has today approved a license to store waste from US, UK and possibly Australian nuclear submarines at HMAS Stirling off Perth.
The licence allows the Australian Submarine Agency to establish a 'Controlled Industrial Facility' to handle the waste of US and UK nuclear submarines that dock at HMAS Stirling Navy Base, Garden Island, in Western Australia.
The nuclear regulatory body, the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA) said in a statement the license is "intended" to cover low-level waste from US and UK nuclear submarines.
However, the Australian Submarine Agency admitted in the June Senate Estimates hearings that the licence also covers intermediate-level waste.
ARPANSA received 165 public submissions concerning this licence application, many concerned over the lack of public information concerning the scope of the application, community impact and decision-making.
The Albanese Labor government are currently in the process of seeking to pass legislation that can make anywhere in Australia a nuclear waste dumping ground with no public consultation or First Nations consent.
The Australian Naval Nuclear Power Safety Bill 2023 also allows for the US and the UK to dump high-level nuclear waste in Australia.
Senator David Shoebridge, Greens Spokesperson for Defence, said:
"We are already seeing the toxic impacts of AUKUS with this move to store nuclear waste from US and UK nuclear submarines off Perth. The community overwhelmingly opposed this application and pointed out the lack of transparency and balance in the approvals process.
"It is remarkable that ASA failed to include in its public consultation material the fact that this license allows for the handling of intermediate-level waste. This waste is significantly more toxic than any other nuclear waste currently stored in Australia.
"While this licence was quietly pushed through, the Albanese Labor Government has stalled legislation in Parliament that would allow unlimited amounts of high-level nuclear waste to be dumped here.
"This ARPANSA licence looks like a rushed plan B from Labor to avoid the political damage it from pushing its naval nuclear waste legislation while also trying to oppose Dutton's disastrous civil nuclear plans."
Senator Dorinda Cox, WA Senator and Greens spokesperson for First Nations, Resources, North Australia, Trade and Tourism:
"As a First Nations woman, today's approval of this licence devastates and angers me. It is shameful that although I stood with my community outside Minister King's office in protest and the voices were clear, they did not want the storage of nuclear waste on their lands, this licence has still been granted."
"There has been no respect shown to the community and to Traditional owners who opposed this licence.
"I personally raised this lack of prior and informed consent at recent Estimates and was assured consultation would happen. Myself and the Traditional Owners of these lands are still waiting for the basic respect of a meeting to share our concerns and be consulted with.
"Today's decision yet again silences our voices and is shameful. First Nations peoples have seen nuclear storage devastate their lands, waterways and communities before. This storage is costly and will destroy irreplaceable cultural heritage, including intangible heritage such as song lines and the local biodiversity.
"Why are the Labor government allowing this to take place in our waters alongside the silencing of First Nations voices again and at the risk and detriment of all Australians? This is shameful."
