QLD Courts Set For 56 Appearances On 25 January

QLD Courts Data

Queensland courts are set for a busy day today, with over 50 people scheduled to appear in magistrates courts across the state.

These court appearances, spread across various regions, reflect the daily operations of the justice system in addressing a wide range of legal matters.

These figures do not account for appearances covered by suppression or non-publication orders. Courts take care to comply with such orders and legal provisions to prevent the release of sensitive information or the exposure of protected individuals.

The distribution of court appearances across the state today includes:

CourtAppearances
Maryborough12
Southport10
Townsville10
Rockhampton8
Ipswich7
Mackay2
Mount Isa2
Gladstone1
Hervey Bay1
Maroochydore1
Mornington Island1
Roma1

Daily court listings are published every day as part of our ongoing commitment to public interest journalism, compiled from publicly available court information across Australia to ensure transparency and keep the public informed.

These listings are based on public records of court appearances, with no suggestion whatsoever of any wrongdoing by those named. Individuals may be appearing for numerous reasons, including procedural or administrative matters.

Gladstone

MatterCourt NumberTime
O'Sullivan, Glenn Edward, Mr18:30AM

Hervey Bay

MatterCourt NumberTime
Waterton, Duddley Matthew19:30AM

Ipswich

MatterCourt NumberTime
James, Owen Hendrikus18:30AM
Karkoe, Erol Stanley19:00AM
Lane, Damien James18:30AM
Martin, Aaron Geoffrey19:00AM
Noy, Jacobe Charles, Mr19:00AM
Skinner, Todd Alexander John19:00AM
Weatherall, Isaiah Paul19:00AM

Mackay

MatterCourt NumberTime
Barba, Aaron Leigh19:00AM
Westbrook, Daniel Tearii Rongo-Ari19:00AM

Maroochydore

MatterCourt NumberTime
Harriott, Joshua Gordon, Mr19:00AM

Maryborough

MatterCourt NumberTime
Bearman, Keith John, Mr19:00AM
Farrell, Haydn James19:00AM
Grice, Duncan Robert19:00AM
Landers, Jackson18:30AM
Mcauley, Anthony, Mr19:00AM
Mcgarrigal, Nicholas James, Mr18:30AM
Poultney, Jason Neil, Mr18:30AM
Sanders, Paul-Micheal, Mr18:30AM
Tambakis, James Brian, Mr19:00AM
Tambakis, James Brian, Mr18:30AM
Tangole, Elijah Shawn18:30AM
Williams, Kyle Grant, Mr19:00AM

Mornington Island

MatterCourt NumberTime
Goodman, Christian Bambra19:00AM

Mount Isa

MatterCourt NumberTime
Aplin, Alexine Doris18:30AM
Wilson, Andrew Glenn, Mr18:30AM

Rockhampton

MatterCourt NumberTime
Catlin, Darryl Stewart, Mr19:00AM
D'Alton, Kyle Tyler19:00AM
Gray, Colin Scott19:00AM
Owen, Robert John19:00AM
Sullivan, Pharaoh Ross Troy19:00AM
Thompson, Brendan Vaughan, Mr19:00AM
Warner, Angelo Anfernee19:00AM
Wilkins, Blake Justin, Mr19:00AM

Roma

MatterCourt NumberTime
Caramalis, Duane Lee George, Mr19:00AM

Southport

MatterCourt NumberTime
Alexander, Joshua Jaimes Noelan18:30AM
Axelby, Marc18:30AM
Dale, Warren18:30AM
Elliot, Ryan James18:30AM
Hamilton, Brendon Steven Perry19:00AM
Johnston, Luke James29:00AM
Lettice, Alex Joseph18:30AM
Neilson, Jamie Alan, Mr18:30AM
Overington, Scott James18:30AM
Peatey, Leanne Veronica29:00AM

Townsville

MatterCourt NumberTime
Allen, Ashley Waed19:00AM
Blanco, Jarrad110:00AM
Gundy, Jerome Nathaniel19:00AM
Howe, Daniel John19:00AM
Hughes, Zachery William Cain19:00AM
Neville, Tyson James Dalton19:00AM
Smith, Emmaley Terease19:00AM
Tagney, Mark James19:00AM
Taylor, Benjamin Adam19:00AM
Taylor, Shane Alex, Mr19:00AM

Open justice is a cornerstone of the Australian legal system, ensuring that court proceedings are transparent and accessible to the public. This principle is fundamental to maintaining public confidence in the fairness, integrity, and efficiency of the judiciary. By allowing the public to scrutinize court processes, open justice acts as a safeguard against abuses of power, ensuring that justice is not only done but seen to be done. It helps foster accountability within the judicial system, reinforcing the idea that everyone is treated equally before the law.

However, there are exceptions to the principle of open justice when transparency could interfere with the proper administration of justice. In such cases, courts may issue suppression or non-publication orders to protect sensitive information. These orders are made in circumstances where openness could cause harm, such as endangering national security, compromising justice, or causing undue distress to individuals involved. The balance between transparency and protecting sensitive details ensures that justice is both effective and fair while safeguarding individuals' rights and public interests.

Every effort has been made to comply with non-publication (suppression) orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this information.

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.