Research: Dogs Favor Texture Over Shape in Object ID

Eötvös Loránd University

In a new study exploring how dogs recognize and generalize objects, researchers from Eötvös Lorand University (Budapest) discovered that dogs prioritize texture over shape when identifying objects.

For the study the researchers recruited 35 dogs who were trained to fetch a target object from a set of distractors. During testing, the dogs were presented with two choices: one matching the target in shape and the other in texture.

The test consited of eight trials—four target trials, where they had to choose between the trained target object and an object with similar shape or texture, and four generalization trials, where the dogs chose between two objects: one similar to the target in shape, but with a different texture, and the other with the same texture but different shape.

The dogs often approached the shape-matching object first but

ultimately selected the texture-matching object,

suggesting that first they first tended to use sight to approach the object that was visibly similar to the target in shape, but then

tactile cues were key in their final choice.

These results highlight dogs' reliance on different sensory modalities, similar to humans only to some extent, when identifying and generalizing objects.

The video abstract is available at this link: https://youtu.be/io6K9vgNAOc?si=fd1lk1tDxHxtjrH9

The study has just been pubished in Scientific Reports: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-72244-y?utm_source=rct_congratemailt&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=oa_20241114&utm_content=10.1038/s41598-024-72244-y

This research is part of the Gifted Dogs research project: https://ethology.elte.hu/gifteddogs

The researchers are looking for dogs that know the name of their toys to participate with their owners in the studies.
/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.