Scientists Create Ultra-highly Stable Cu-based Catalysts

Chinese Academy of Sciences

The development of Cu-based catalysts is limited due to their poor thermal stability caused by the low Tammann temperature of Cu.

Recently, a research group led by Prof. YU Jiafeng and Prof. SUN Jian from the Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics (DICP) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) constructed an ultra-highly stable Cu-based heterogeneous catalyst at high temperatures by constructing classical strong metal-support interactions (SMSIs).

This study was published in Nature Communications on Dec. 10. Prof. Noritatsu Tsubaki from Japan's Toyama University and Prof. LIU Yuefeng from DICP were also involved in this study.

Ultra-high stable Cu/LaTiO2 heterogeneous catalyst at 800°C (Image by YU Jiafeng)

The researchers combined two unique technologies, magnetron sputtering (SP) and flame spray pyrolysis (FSP), to reconstruct the electronic structure of metallic Cu and the reducibility of the TiO2 support, respectively.

They created the classic SMSI on non-noble metal Cu-based catalyst at mild reduction temperatures for the first time, and realized controllable preparation of ultra-highly stable Cu-based catalyst. This catalyst exhibited ultra-stable performance for more than 500 hours at 600 °C. The sintering of Cu nanoparticles was effectively suppressed even at 800 °C.

Moreover, the strength of SMSI could be effectively controlled not only by reducing temperatures as before but also by tailor-made Cu via sputtering power regulation or decorated supports for rational catalyst design on demands.

"We expect that our new findings will serve as a general guide to design a highly stable heterogeneous catalyst at a wider range of temperatures," said Prof. SUN.

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China and DICP.

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.