Security Firm Fined £46,000 for Unlicensed Staff

UK Gov

SPS Doorguard Ltd has been fined after deploying unlicensed security staff to sites across Scotland.

A security company has been fined £4,000 and must pay back more than £42,000 in proceeds of crime after it repeatedly deployed unlicensed security services to several high-profile sites across Scotland.

Glasgow-based SPS Doorguard Ltd knowingly provided several clients with unlicensed security guards to protect properties, including one near the COP26 summit in Glasgow in 2021.

After an investigation by the SIA, Glasgow Sheriff Court ruled that the company had received a criminal benefit of £42,039. This will now be seized using a court-issued confiscation order under the Proceeds of Crime Act.

Glasgow Sheriff Court fined the company £4,000 at the sentencing on 8 January 2025, which is in addition to the £42,039 to be seized. The company must also pay a £175 victim surcharge.

Nicola Bolton, Criminal Investigations Manager at the SIA, said:

An important part of keeping the public safe is ensuring that people working in the private security industry are properly licensed. By working illegally, SPS Doorguard Ltd profited significantly at the expense of those they were employed to protect. They are now facing the consequences.

This court order will help to redress the imbalance that operating illegally has on the private security industry. It demonstrates that crime does not pay.

SPS Doorguard LTD pleaded guilty on 4 July and were sentenced on 8 January 2025 at Glasgow Sheriff Court.

Notes

By law, security operatives working under contract must hold and display a valid SIA licence. Information about SIA enforcement and penalties can be found on GOV.UK/SIA .

The offence relating to the Fraud Act 2006 that is mentioned above is:

  • Section 7 - supplying an article for use in fraud

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.