Stonegate, PCA Cooperating on Historic Pubs Code Breaches

The Issue

The Pubs Code requires the pub company to provide the tenant with a Rent Proposal where it proposes a new agreement - regulation 15(7). It should do this before the tenant considers independent professional advice, such as business, legal, property and rental valuation advice - regulation 17(f). The tenant must take this advice before they prepare their business plan - regulation 10(2)(a). The Rent Proposal provides tenants with valuable information to understand how the rent has been calculated.

The PCA is reviewing information from Stonegate to understand legacy processes for providing rental information on new agreements since the start of the Code. This is in relation to historic compliance issues, including Code breaches identified in its Annual Compliance Report for 2020/21 that it had provided the Rent Proposal after the tenant had produced their initial business plan. Stonegate said the process was intended to ensure the tenant formed their own independent initial view of the business and was not influenced by Stonegate's rent proposal data. It adds that the tenant was then invited to revisit any advice and/or their business plan in light of receiving Stonegate's rent proposal. This is contrary to the Code as the Rent Proposal must be provided to the tenant before they consider independent professional advice, which in turn must be taken before the tenant prepares their business plan.

Stonegate said that it had rectified this in the 2021/22 reporting period to ensure the Rent Proposal was provided before the tenant submits their business plan.

Stonegate continues to cooperate with the PCA in this matter, including to identify how many tenants have been affected by non-compliance, and any detriment caused. Further information will be published as appropriate.

Affected Tenants

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.