An international meta study reveals that there may be less of certain mould toxins in organically grown grain, compared to grain grown in the conventional manner. This, and other findings from research into agricultural products, can have major consequences.
Professor at the Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Per Ole Iversen, is the only doctor who has contributed to the meta-study on mold in grain. Photo: Anne Wennberg, UiO
- Up until now, the general assumption has been that grain grown using organic methods is more contaminated with mould toxins than grain grown in the conventional way and contaminated grain can pose a health risk to humans. An extensive meta analysis published in the acclaimed journal Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, demonstrates the opposite, says professor Per Ole Iversen.
He is one of two scientists from the Department of Nutrition at UiO who participated in the study. Carlo Leifert, professor of organic agriculture and currently a guest professor at the Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, also both initiated and participated in the study.
Several advantages to organic farming
Iversen is the representative of human medicine in the research group and believes that the study is greatly strengthened by being interdisciplinary.
- The meta study we have just published makes it clear that organic methods of cultivation do not lead to a higher incidence of mould in crops than conventionally grown grain, and to some extent, the opposite is the case: for two types of mould, there was no difference.
In addition, the study has also revealed a number of advantages linked to organic cultivation.
- Research into organically grown foods has been carried out for many years and many people believe that this type of cultivation is good for both livestock and farmers - and for human health - but we were not quite sure about the latter. Now it looks as if organically grown fruit and vegetables have a more favourable content of antioxidants and micronutrients than agricultural products produced in the conventional way, and this can be good for both you and me, says Iversen.
Surprising findings on mould
Iversen believes that the study will have major consequences.
- The myth that organic cultivation has a higher risk of being affected by mould has now been largely refuted. In any case, it should not weaken the message that organic food production is to be recommended, says Iversen, adding that these findings are very surprising and have weight, since they are based on a large number of well documented findings from different parts of the world.
Students and pregnant women are included in the study
Iversen and his colleagues have previously conducted a randomised, clinical study among university students, where they also found that organically grown food is advantageous compared to agricultural products cultivated in the normal way.
- We are currently carrying out a new randomised study, which examines two groups of pregnant women: one group is eating organic food while the other is eating ordinary food during pregnancy. We will then carry out a thorough study of the effect of the organic food intake on both mothers and babies for two years following each baby's birth, he explains.
Per Ole Iversen played two roles in the extensive meta study:
- I participated in the selection of the studies to be included. In addition, I contributed with reflections from a doctor's point of view on what kind of consequences the study could have for the health of ordinary people.
