TAS Govt Urged to Fund Preventive Health Strategy

Public Health Association of Australia

The Tasmanian Government's forthcoming Preventive Health Strategy is a positive move, but it will only be effective if it's properly funded and its recommendations fulfilled, the peak body for public health professionals says.

The Public Health Association of Australia's remarks come ahead of its public forum about the strategy today in Nipaluna Hobart.

"We welcome the proposed Tasmanian Preventive Health Strategy, which will join the National Preventive Health Strategy," Association CEO, Adj Prof Terry Slevin said.

"The Rockliff Government is rightly undergoing a detailed consultation process on the strategy. But ultimately, it needs to translate its intentions into actions against chronic diseases afflicting Tasmanians, to reduce the numbers of people getting crook. And that means allocating funds to implement the strategy. Without money attached, such strategies frequently serve no benefit.

"Nearly seven in 10 Tasmanians have a chronic health condition. About 15% of Tasmanians smoke, only 6% consumed the recommended amount of vegetables, and 35% eat enough fruit. More than one third of Tasmanians' diet comes from unhealthy products.

"We need actions like making it easier for people to build walking or riding into their daily lives, to improving access and consumption of fresh fruit and vegetables, coupled with restrictions on the marketing of unhealthy food, and where fast food outlets are located.

"Preventive health measures take time to show results, but they reduce pressures on Tasmania's ambulances and hospital systems, and are a smart use of the public's money. Prevention is playing the long game in health, and Tasmanians have the right to expect their government to look into the future to safeguard their health.

"If done right, this is a genuine opportunity to boost the health of the people of Tasmania," Adj Prof Slevin said.

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).